IETF MOQ WG: Consensus call on way forward on REWIND

Message Snapshot

• List: moq@ietf.org
• Thread subject: Consensus call on way forward on REWIND
• Message subject: [Moq] Re: Consensus call on way forward on REWIND
• Author: Ian Swett
• Published: 2026-04-29T21:27:57.000Z
• Source tag: ietf-mailing-list
• Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive

Summary

Ian Swett posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on April 29, 2026. As Magnus said, I was stating my preference as an individual. On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 6:49 AM Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund= 40ericsson.co…

Why It Matters

This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.

Message Excerpt

As Magnus said, I was stating my preference as an individual. On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 6:49 AM Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund= 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

Plain-Text Body

As Magnus said, I was stating my preference as an individual.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 6:49 AM Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund= 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

Are you thinking of a variant of the REWIND proposal that delivers past Objects on the bidi stream? For latency reasons, I expect Subscribe style delivery over multiple streams to be faster in many cases, but do you not think it has sufficient value?

"This removes the subscriber round trip, extends coverage beyond the current group, and makes Joining FETCH redundant" - Yes, that's certainly ideal.