IETF MOQ WG: Consensus call on Object filters

Message Snapshot

• List: moq@ietf.org
• Thread subject: Consensus call on Object filters
• Message subject: [Moq] Consensus call on Object filters
• Author: Magnus Westerlund
• Published: 2026-05-12T11:42:17.000Z
• Source tag: ietf-mailing-list
• Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive

Summary

Magnus Westerlund posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 12, 2026. WG, In yesterday�s meeting we did two polls related to the filters proposal (https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1518). The chairs…

Why It Matters

This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.

Message Excerpt

WG, In yesterday�s meeting we did two polls related to the filters proposal (https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1518). The chairs take away from that is that we had a good indication of there being a rough consensus for including the Object Filters part. The signal from the top-n track filters was showing cl…

Plain-Text Body

WG,

In yesterday�s meeting we did two polls related to the filters proposal (https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1518). The chairs take away from that is that we had a good indication of there being a rough consensus for including the Object Filters part. The signal from the top-n track filters was showing clear interest but equally strong no. So this part needs further discussion, I will start a separate thread on that part.

This functionality would be optional to support and will have an option to indicate the maximum number of filters.

This is a two-week (until the end of the 26th of May) consensus call on including object filters as described in PR #1518 into the MOQT specification. I encourage all, also those that participated in the poll, to state a position. State if you are supporting including Object filters in the MOQT specification.

Supporting / Not Supporting

Comments:

Magnus Westerlund MOQ Chair