Back to News
news

IETF MOQ WG: Consensus call on Object filters

Luke Curley posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 14, 2026. Hey Lorenzo, that's exactly my view too. In an ideal world, a relay would only ingress what it egresses. But I don't think that's possible with o…

Source: IETF Mailing ListView source →

Message Snapshot

  • List: moq@ietf.org
  • Thread subject: Consensus call on Object filters
  • Message subject: [Moq] Re: Consensus call on Object filters
  • Author: Luke Curley
  • Published: 2026-05-14T15:20:10.000Z
  • Source tag: ietf-mailing-list
  • Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive

Summary

Luke Curley posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 14, 2026. Hey Lorenzo, that's exactly my view too. In an ideal world, a relay would only ingress what it egresses. But I don't think that's possible with o…

Why It Matters

This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.

Message Excerpt

Hey Lorenzo, that's exactly my view too. In an ideal world, a relay would only ingress what it egresses. But I don't think that's possible with object/track filters; the edge cases become

Plain-Text Body

Hey Lorenzo, that's exactly my view too.

In an ideal world, a relay would only ingress what it egresses. But I don't think that's possible with object/track filters; the edge cases become extraordinarily difficult.

And Victor, I strongly think SVC should use separate tracks instead of object filters. It fixes a bunch of problems (including HoLB) as you can selectively SUBSCRIBE and prioritize each layer.

Stay ahead of MOQ

Get the latest IETF MOQ standards updates, protocol analysis, and ecosystem news delivered to your inbox.

Go deeper with MOQ Edge Pro

Weekly deep-dives, IETF standards tracking, and streaming tech trend reports — from $9/mo.

See plans →