IETF MOQ WG: Consensus call on Object filters
Luke Curley posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 14, 2026. Hey Lorenzo, that's exactly my view too. In an ideal world, a relay would only ingress what it egresses. But I don't think that's possible with o…
Message Snapshot
- List:
moq@ietf.org - Thread subject: Consensus call on Object filters
- Message subject: [Moq] Re: Consensus call on Object filters
- Author: Luke Curley
- Published: 2026-05-14T15:20:10.000Z
- Source tag:
ietf-mailing-list - Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive
Summary
Luke Curley posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 14, 2026. Hey Lorenzo, that's exactly my view too. In an ideal world, a relay would only ingress what it egresses. But I don't think that's possible with o…
Why It Matters
This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.
Message Excerpt
Hey Lorenzo, that's exactly my view too. In an ideal world, a relay would only ingress what it egresses. But I don't think that's possible with object/track filters; the edge cases become
Plain-Text Body
Hey Lorenzo, that's exactly my view too.
In an ideal world, a relay would only ingress what it egresses. But I don't think that's possible with object/track filters; the edge cases become extraordinarily difficult.
And Victor, I strongly think SVC should use separate tracks instead of object filters. It fixes a bunch of problems (including HoLB) as you can selectively SUBSCRIBE and prioritize each layer.