IETF MOQ WG: Joining FETCH Survey
Alan Frindell posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 15, 2026. Luke, I am translating you to: Question 1: 4 (Joining FETCH meets your use case functionally but is not performant)
Message Snapshot
- List:
moq@ietf.org - Thread subject: Joining FETCH Survey
- Message subject: [Moq] Re: Joining FETCH Survey
- Author: Alan Frindell
- Published: 2026-05-15T17:47:37.000Z
- Source tag:
ietf-mailing-list - Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive
Summary
Alan Frindell posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 15, 2026. Luke, I am translating you to: Question 1: 4 (Joining FETCH meets your use case functionally but is not performant)
Why It Matters
This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.
Message Excerpt
Luke, I am translating you to: Question 1: 4 (Joining FETCH meets your use case functionally but is not performant)
Plain-Text Body
Luke, I am translating you to:
Question 1: 4 (Joining FETCH meets your use case functionally but is not performant)
Question 2: 3 (Require Unified control messages and data plane for current group)
Question 3: MAY remove joining FETCH
Question 4.1: Not answered (inferred because you aren't asking for SUBSCRIBE before current group) Question 4.2: No (You are saying use subscribe for CG and subscribe doesn't need flow control) Question 4.3: MUST (because you said CurrentGroupFill and that's how it works)
Question 5: Not answered (your tolerance for delaying the specification for this in particular is unknown)
Let me know if any of that is incorrect.
Thanks
-Alan