IETF MOQ WG: Weekly github digest (Media Over QUIC Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 17, 2026. Events without label "editorial" Issues ------
Message Snapshot
- List:
moq@ietf.org - Thread subject: Weekly github digest (Media Over QUIC Activity Summary)
- Message subject: [Moq] Weekly github digest (Media Over QUIC Activity Summary)
- Author: Repository Activity Summary Bot
- Published: 2026-05-17T09:20:51.000Z
- Source tag:
ietf-mailing-list - Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive
Summary
Repository Activity Summary Bot posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 17, 2026. Events without label "editorial" Issues ------
Why It Matters
This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.
Message Excerpt
Events without label "editorial" Issues ------
Plain-Text Body
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
-
moq-wg/moq-transport (+1/-10/💬6) 1 issues created:
- MOQ-18: Properties Type collision with LOC-02 (by yuanchao-chris) https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/1632 [Needs PR]
5 issues received 6 new comments:
- #1632 MOQ-18: Properties Type collision with LOC-02 (1 by afrind) https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/1632 [Needs PR]
- #1603 What is the use case for required-request-id (2 by afrind) https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/1603 [Security/DoS] [Past Deadline]
- #1519 Improve design of requests blocking on other requests (1 by afrind) https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/1519 [Needs Discussion]
- #1459 Request ID validation is broken in draft-16 (1 by afrind) https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/1459 [Implementation Blocker] [BLOCKED]
- #607 Do we need Group Order for Subscriptions ? (1 by afrind) https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/607 [Subscribe] [Parked]
10 issues closed:
- Do we need Group Order for Subscriptions ? https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/607 [Subscribe] [Parked]
- Request ID validation is broken in draft-16 https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/1459 [Implementation Blocker] [BLOCKED]
- DELIVERY_TIMEOUT is unimplementable https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/667 [Transmission/Priority]
- Missing aspects in the security consideration section https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/783 [Needs PR] [Security/DoS]
- Define session reuse rules and improve scope definition. https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/1432 [Needs PR]
- Can a publisher 'lie' about what Largest Object is? And does Largest Object need to exist? https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/1386 [Subscribe] [Joining Fetch Dissent]
- Do we need a way to move / goaway for individual track https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/1481 [Control Messages]
- What is the use case for required-request-id https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/1603 [Security/DoS] [Past Deadline]
- Improve startup latency https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/83 [Needs PR] [Handshake and Session] [Publish]
- Explain security of 0-rtt setup https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/issues/420 [Needs PR] [Handshake and Session] [Security/DoS]
-
moq-wg/warp-streaming-format (+2/-8/💬17) 2 issues created:
- Version should carry draft info for interop until released (by wilaw) https://github.com/moq-wg/msf/issues/163
- Track-level codec switching semantics (by yuanchao-chris) https://github.com/moq-wg/msf/issues/162
12 issues received 17 new comments:
- #162 Track-level codec switching semantics (1 by wilaw) https://github.com/moq-wg/msf/issues/162
- #155 Sequence aligned groups are too restrictive (1 by wilaw) https://github.com/moq-wg/msf/issues/155
- #153
initTrackdoes not work (1 by suhasHere) https://github.co…