IETF MOQ WG: Consensus call on Object filters
Cullen Fluffy Jennings posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 19, 2026. I’m pretty on the fence about this by itself. Without track filters it seems somewhat minimal use, and the cases it does solve, could…
Message Snapshot
- List:
moq@ietf.org - Thread subject: Consensus call on Object filters
- Message subject: [Moq] Re: Consensus call on Object filters
- Author: Cullen Fluffy Jennings
- Published: 2026-05-19T15:33:43.000Z
- Source tag:
ietf-mailing-list - Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive
Summary
Cullen Fluffy Jennings posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 19, 2026. I’m pretty on the fence about this by itself. Without track filters it seems somewhat minimal use, and the cases it does solve, could…
Why It Matters
This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.
Message Excerpt
I’m pretty on the fence about this by itself. Without track filters it seems somewhat minimal use, and the cases it does solve, could be solved other ways. With track filters with top N, it is very useful for lots of cases and I strongly support it.
Plain-Text Body
I’m pretty on the fence about this by itself. Without track filters it seems somewhat minimal use, and the cases it does solve, could be solved other ways. With track filters with top N, it is very useful for lots of cases and I strongly support it.