IETF MOQ WG: Support for Track Filters and Top-N
Cullen Fluffy Jennings posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 27, 2026. Magnus, thought I agree with your conclusion there is not consensus to add this draft right now, I disagree it should be done as a sep…
Message Snapshot
- List:
moq@ietf.org - Thread subject: Support for Track Filters and Top-N
- Message subject: [Moq] Re: Support for Track Filters and Top-N
- Author: Cullen Fluffy Jennings
- Published: 2026-05-27T19:26:38.000Z
- Source tag:
ietf-mailing-list - Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive
Summary
Cullen Fluffy Jennings posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on May 27, 2026. Magnus, thought I agree with your conclusion there is not consensus to add this draft right now, I disagree it should be done as a sep…
Why It Matters
This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.
Message Excerpt
Magnus, thought I agree with your conclusion there is not consensus to add this draft right now, I disagree it should be done as a separate draft. I think it should be worked as a PR that can be discussed in context. I think the experience with DTS has shown how much more confusing it is to do this in a separate draft…
Plain-Text Body
Magnus, thought I agree with your conclusion there is not consensus to add this draft right now, I disagree it should be done as a separate draft. I think it should be worked as a PR that can be discussed in context. I think the experience with DTS has shown how much more confusing it is to do this in a separate draft.
I would like to keep working on this as a PR. Thoughts ? or are you concluding that it can not move forward as something we put in MoQT ?