IETF MOQ WG: London Interim Preliminary Agenda
Suhas Nandakumar posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on June 2, 2026. I looked through the agenda and am thinking about focusing on resolving bigger issues that would really benefit from a face-to-face meeting…
Message Snapshot
- List:
moq@ietf.org - Thread subject: London Interim Preliminary Agenda
- Message subject: [Moq] Re: London Interim Preliminary Agenda
- Author: Suhas Nandakumar
- Published: 2026-06-02T19:37:42.000Z
- Source tag:
ietf-mailing-list - Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive
Summary
Suhas Nandakumar posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on June 2, 2026. I looked through the agenda and am thinking about focusing on resolving bigger issues that would really benefit from a face-to-face meeting…
Why It Matters
This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.
Message Excerpt
I looked through the agenda and am thinking about focusing on resolving bigger issues that would really benefit from a face-to-face meeting setting, due to the design nature of
Plain-Text Body
I looked through the agenda and am thinking about focusing on resolving bigger issues that would really
benefit from a face-to-face meeting setting, due to the design nature of these topics.
Here is my rough proposal:
Topics that would be good to get face-to-face time to discuss:
-
• *DTS
-
• *Top-N Track Filtering
-
• *Request Blocking
Topics that seem good to be discussed at virtual interims:
-
• *Concurrent Subscribes
-
• *CDN Provisioning
-
• *MSFTS
-
• *MSF/CMSF
-
• *Privacy Pass
-
• *Secure Objects
-
• *LOC update
On Object Range Filters, since range filters was approved, do we need to spend face-to-face time on this, or can it be moved to a virtual interim as well?
cheers Suhas On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 11:08 AM Martin Duke martin.h.duke@gmail.com wrote: