Back to News
news

IETF MOQ WG: Design PRs to Review

Alan Frindell posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on June 23, 2026. Hi, in the moq-transport repo you will find a number of PRs marked "Design". These are proposed resolutions to the issues we discussed in Lond…

Source: IETF Mailing ListView source →

Message Snapshot

  • List: moq@ietf.org
  • Thread subject: Design PRs to Review
  • Message subject: [Moq] Design PRs to Review
  • Author: Alan Frindell
  • Published: 2026-06-23T16:56:53.000Z
  • Source tag: ietf-mailing-list
  • Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive

Summary

Alan Frindell posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on June 23, 2026. Hi, in the moq-transport repo you will find a number of PRs marked "Design". These are proposed resolutions to the issues we discussed in Lond…

Why It Matters

This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.

Message Excerpt

Hi, in the moq-transport repo you will find a number of PRs marked "Design". These are proposed resolutions to the issues we discussed in London, along with some from recent issues that were filed post London.

Plain-Text Body

Hi, in the moq-transport repo you will find a number of PRs marked "Design". These are proposed resolutions to the issues we discussed in London, along with some from recent issues that were filed post London. The editors would like to merge as many as possible into draft-19. We will follow our normal process -- PRs labelled Design require approval from all 4 Editors/Authors and must be up for working group review for 2 weeks before landing.

The biggest changes that could benefit from the broadest review are:

#1673 Replace Joining FETCH with fill fetch streams https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1673 (narrowed version of #1642) #1674 Track Switching via the SWITCH_FROM parameter https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1674 (hard switch only) #1675 SWITCH_FROM Soft Mode https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1675 (soft mode only) #1765 Add Range Filters https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1765

Please prioritize reviews of the above. Follow up work, for example moving to Location Filters, is blocked on some of the above.

Other work in flight:

Other PRs that capture the outcomes of our discussions in London:

#1698 Clarify FIN vs RST/STOP_SENDING semantics on request streams https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1698 #1770 Make Default Publisher Priority an updatable parameter https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/170 #1771 Specify relay processing rules for known Track Properties https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1771 #1775 Clarify multiple concurrent subscriptions per Track https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1775 #1777 Move GROUP_ORDER from PUBLISH_OK to SUBSCRIBE_TRACKS https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1777 #1782 Update Forward handling for relays https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1782 #1613 Add MAX_REQUEST_UPDATES setup option and TOO_MANY_REQUEST_UPDATES error https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1613

Other PRs generated from Cullen's Review:

#1760 Make Object Status payload rule extensible via IANA registry https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1760 #1780 Clarify forwarding preference order in scheduling https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-transport/pull/1780

Thanks

-Alan and Ian

Stay ahead of MOQ

Get the latest IETF MOQ standards updates, protocol analysis, and ecosystem news delivered to your inbox.

Go deeper with MOQ Edge Pro

Weekly deep-dives, IETF standards tracking, and streaming tech trend reports — from $9/mo.

See plans →