IETF MOQ WG: Review of PR1673
Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on July 3, 2026. Cullen Fluffy Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote: I agree nested parameters are likely to surprise and confuse people. So will nested propert…
Message Snapshot
- List:
moq@ietf.org - Thread subject: Review of PR1673
- Message subject: [Moq] Re: Review of PR1673
- Author: Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Published: 2026-07-03T19:53:37.000Z
- Source tag:
ietf-mailing-list - Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive
Summary
Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on July 3, 2026. Cullen Fluffy Jennings fluffy@iii.ca wrote: I agree nested parameters are likely to surprise and confuse people. So will nested propert…
Why It Matters
This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.
Message Excerpt
Cullen Fluffy Jennings fluffy@iii.ca wrote: I agree nested parameters are likely to surprise and confuse people. So will nested properties. The sections that introduce parameters (and properties) should mention there are nested special cases along with any general rules about top level vs nested ones. For example, d…
Plain-Text Body
Cullen Fluffy Jennings fluffy@iii.ca wrote:
I agree nested parameters are likely to surprise and confuse people. So will nested properties. The sections that introduce parameters (and properties) should mention there are nested special cases along with any general rules about top level vs nested ones. For example, delta encoding context resets at each nested level.
Mo