IETF MOQ WG: agenda for sept 8 meeting ?
Alan Frindell posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on September 8, 2026. Hi Cullen, sorry about that, we had a draft agenda circulating among editors and chairs and it didn't go out. 1. Review document refactor
Message Snapshot
- List:
moq@ietf.org - Thread subject: agenda for sept 8 meeting ?
- Message subject: [Moq] Re: agenda for sept 8 meeting ?
- Author: Alan Frindell
- Published: 2026-09-08T00:15:07.000Z
- Source tag:
ietf-mailing-list - Message URL: Open in IETF Mail Archive
Summary
Alan Frindell posted to the MOQ working group mailing list on September 8, 2026. Hi Cullen, sorry about that, we had a draft agenda circulating among editors and chairs and it didn't go out. 1. Review document refactor
Why It Matters
This message came from the public MOQ working group archive and captures active discussion, meeting coordination, or implementation feedback around Media over QUIC.
Message Excerpt
Hi Cullen, sorry about that, we had a draft agenda circulating among editors and chairs and it didn't go out. 1. Review document refactor
Plain-Text Body
Hi Cullen, sorry about that, we had a draft agenda circulating among editors and chairs and it didn't go out.
- Review document refactor
- Decide on Seattle interop plan
- FYI: Fill-Fetch Landed in -20 PR #1673
Open issues/PRs
- Should we remove ‘FORWARD’, since we have other ways to ‘pause’ a Subscription? PR #1825
- SWITCH_FROM #1674 and #1675
- Updating Default Publisher Priority (redux) PR #1770
- No Need for ‘End Location’ or ‘End of Track’ in FETCH_OK Issue #1897
- #1792 Revisit prohibition on SUB_NS/TRACKS prefix overlap
- #1696 Empty Namespace
- #1857 Subgroup or Group level properteis
- #1933 Option to SUBSCRIBE / TRACKS with metadata only
If there are issues besides these you would like to discuss I think we could shuffle things around.
Thanks
-Alan