Back to News
analysis

The MOQ Catalog Format: Describing Media for the Modern Web

An in-depth look at draft-ietf-moq-catalogformat, the standard way to describe available media tracks in a MOQ session.

Source: IETF DatatrackerView source →

Why Catalogs Matter

In any media delivery system, subscribers need a way to discover what content is available and how to consume it. In HLS, this role is played by the M3U8 playlist. In DASH, it's the MPD manifest. In MOQ, it's the catalog.

What the Catalog Contains

The MOQ catalog format (draft-ietf-moq-catalogformat) is a JSON document that describes:

Tracks

Each track represents a named stream of media objects:

{
  "namespace": "live/stream1",
  "name": "video-hd",
  "packaging": "loc",
  "renderGroup": 1,
  "selectionParams": {
    "codec": "avc1.640028",
    "width": 1920,
    "height": 1080,
    "framerate": 30,
    "bitrate": 4500000
  }
}

Track Relationships

Tracks can be grouped for:

  • Render groups: Tracks that should be rendered together (e.g., audio + video)
  • Alternate groups: Tracks that are alternatives (e.g., different quality levels)
  • Language: Multi-language audio tracks

Extensibility

The format includes an extension mechanism for application-specific metadata. This allows platforms to include custom data without modifying the core specification.

How Catalogs Are Delivered

Catalogs themselves are delivered as MOQ tracks. A publisher announces a catalog track, and subscribers can subscribe to it to receive:

  1. The initial catalog (current state of available tracks)
  2. Updates when tracks are added or removed
  3. Changes to track properties

This streaming approach means subscribers always have an up-to-date view of available content.

Catalog vs. Manifest

FeatureHLS M3U8DASH MPDMOQ Catalog
FormatCustom textXMLJSON
DeliveryHTTP pollingHTTP pollingMOQ subscription
UpdatesPoll for changesPoll for changesPush-based
LatencyPolling intervalPolling intervalImmediate
Track DiscoverySequentialFull manifestIncremental

The push-based delivery model is a significant improvement over polling. Subscribers learn about new tracks or quality changes immediately, without waiting for the next manifest refresh.

Implementation Considerations

For implementers, the catalog format is relatively straightforward to work with:

  • JSON parsing is well-supported in every language
  • The schema is designed to be forward-compatible
  • Required fields are minimal; most properties are optional
  • The streaming delivery model uses standard MOQ subscription

The catalog format is one of the more mature parts of the MOQ specification suite, reflecting the working group's consensus that getting track discovery right is essential for adoption.

Stay ahead of MOQ

Get the latest IETF MOQ standards updates, protocol analysis, and ecosystem news delivered to your inbox.

Go deeper with MOQ Edge Pro

Weekly deep-dives, IETF standards tracking, and streaming tech trend reports — from $9/mo.

See plans →